- From: Johnrobert Gardner <John.Robert.Gardner@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:39:04 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Hi Folks: I'm filling in for Jack until we can scope our partic from our QA-chartered internal org's. I'm trying to get up to speed here on the reading, so please bear with me as my role popped up hear a little unexpectedly. Re. below, however, I wanted to weigh in and suggest that I hope it was only the latter contingency Lofton makes, that use cases were "unitentional casualties" and, by implication, will be returned to the requirements. It is very important these are retained ... johnrobert Lofton Henderson wrote: > > QAWG -- > > It appears that we may have inadvertently dropped some explicit conformance > requirements in the new (20021108) SpecGL version [1]. Referring to the > 20020826 version, for example checkpoint 3.1 ([2]) said: > > "[...]the specification must explain why profiles are necessary, by > reference to use cases and/or project requirements." > > Such a requirement was repeated for several other of the DoV (for modules > and levels, at least). > > Did we discuss dropping these requirements? (If yes, can someone point to > the decision?) > > Or, was this an unintentional casualty of SpecGL reorganization? (In > CK13.4 there is allusion in the 3rd bullet to the requirement to be able to > navigate to some statements, but we don't actually have requirements for > the statements anywhere else -- in this sense, the 3rd bullet is different > from all the others). > > -Lofton. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20021108/ > [2] > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20020826/#Ck-choose-profile-grouping -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-| John Robert Gardner | Business Management | Technology Office, IT | Sun Microsystems Inc., UBUR02-306 | 1 Network Drive | Burlington, MA 01803-0903 | Ph. 781-730-4012/#6-9482 fax 442-1539 | e-mail john.robert.gardner@sun.com | ----------------------------------------| Calendar: http://cal.central.sun.com/?calid=jg113402&security=1 http://vedavid.org/diss/ OPINIONS AND VIEWS NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS, ET AL
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 13:39:07 UTC