- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:55:54 -0700
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- It appears that we may have inadvertently dropped some explicit conformance requirements in the new (20021108) SpecGL version [1]. Referring to the 20020826 version, for example checkpoint 3.1 ([2]) said: "[...]the specification must explain why profiles are necessary, by reference to use cases and/or project requirements." Such a requirement was repeated for several other of the DoV (for modules and levels, at least). Did we discuss dropping these requirements? (If yes, can someone point to the decision?) Or, was this an unintentional casualty of SpecGL reorganization? (In CK13.4 there is allusion in the 3rd bullet to the requirement to be able to navigate to some statements, but we don't actually have requirements for the statements anywhere else -- in this sense, the 3rd bullet is different from all the others). -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20021108/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20020826/#Ck-choose-profile-grouping
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 18:55:21 UTC