- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 11:56:59 -0700
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020306114648.03b3f3f0@rockynet.com>
About pre-Friday preparation, I'd like to add one comment to what I said earlier: "[...]There is basically one topic: Issue #55 [1] -- the priorities of the ProcOps checkpoints." We had several issues about the statements and organization of the checkpoints themselves in the FPWD P&O text. None of us had seen the new P&O text [2] before the f2f. It is my recollection from the f2f that some of the checkpoint-content issues were "provisionally" closed -- i.e., without time to study in detail, the new text seemed okay to the issue originator. Before Friday, I'd like people who had issues to verify that they are indeed resolved by the new P&O text. Also, if you have new issues with the new Guideline/Checkpoint structuring, we need to address those -- it doesn't make sense to discuss all of the priorities if we haven't endorsed the checkpoints themselves! Regards, -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html#x55 [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/02/qaframe-ops-0225.html
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 13:55:23 UTC