- From: Karl Tomlinson <w3@karlt.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:03:16 +1300
- To: ion@ams.org
- Cc: www-math@w3.org, mathjax-dev@googlegroups.com
> I am puzzled that it would be thought that the base, the first argument of > an element of type <mover>, <munder> or <munderover> might be expected > to change its size automatically depending on the embellishment. Stretching the base to match the width of the scripts is described here: "If a stretchy operator, or an embellished stretchy operator, is a direct sub-expression of an munder, mover, or munderover element, or [...], then it, or the mo element at its core, should stretch to cover the width of the other direct sub-expressions in the given element [...]" http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter3.html#presm.horiz.stretch.rules
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 21:04:05 UTC