- From: Patrick Ion <ion@ams.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:34:09 -0800
- To: www-math@w3.org
Thank you, Karl. I'd forgotten that and the use case. And this shows that Paul's concerns were entirely well placed. Patrick On 2/23/12 1:03 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: >> I am puzzled that it would be thought that the base, the first argument of >> an element of type <mover>, <munder> or <munderover> might be expected >> to change its size automatically depending on the embellishment. > Stretching the base to match the width of the scripts is described here: > > "If a stretchy operator, or an embellished stretchy operator, is a > direct sub-expression of an munder, mover, or munderover element, > or [...], then it, or the mo element at its core, should stretch > to cover the width of the other direct sub-expressions in the > given element [...]" > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter3.html#presm.horiz.stretch.rules >
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 00:34:39 UTC