- From: Will Robertson <wspr81@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:10:46 +1030
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Hi David, On 18/11/2009, at 8:15 PM, David Carlisle wrote: >> The glyphs shown as examples for sans serif bold italic look as if >> they're from the regular weight: > > It's 10 years ago and I'm not sure I have the sources, but I did > tweak the metafont parameters taking a creative merge of the bold, > slanted and sans serif parameters to come up with a bold sans serif > slanted. Perhaps I wasn't creative enough, I agree it could be > more bold. It wasn't the absolute weight that I was worried about, just that it looked like the same glyphs were being used for normal weight slanted sans serif as well. > I recently discarded my script and bold script glyphs (which were > identical) and replaced them with glyphs derived from the stix beta. > perhaps I should do the same here? The results would certainly look better; not the end of the world either way, of course :) -- Will
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:41:31 UTC