- From: Vladimir Kozlov <Vladimir.Kozlov@idm.ru>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:32:13 +0300
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, www-lib@w3.org, Jose.Kahan@W3.Org (όΜ. ΠΟήΤΑ) <jose.kahan@w3.org>
As far as I remember, I've sent the xml*.dll files compiled without debug information to Jose. (By the way, precompiled version of libwww now includes these files) If not, I could send it without any problem. Jose, could you please commit them? Kind regards, Vladimir. -------------------------- Vladimir Kozlov, IDM, Ltd. e-mail : mailto:Vladimir.Kozlov@idm.ru PGP Key ID : 0x5360FA9B Phone : +7 (095) 534-4221 Fax : +7 (095) 530-2275 www : http://www.idm.ru > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 9:17 PM > To: www-lib@w3.org > Subject: RE: xmlparse.dll included in libwww distribution > > > > I think there is a stripped version of that dll somewhere, > no? Otherwise, it > should be relatively easy to recompile it without debug information. > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > http://magnet > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel DeYoung [mailto:joel@deyoung.net] > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 08:05 > To: jjc@clark.com > Cc: frystyk@w3.org > Subject: xmlparse.dll included in libwww distribution > > > I downloaded and built under Win32 version 5.2.8 of the libwww > distribution, which includes the expat xml package. I link with the > provided import libraries (xmlparse.lib & xmltok.lib) and use > the provided > Win32 DLLs (xmlparse.dll & xmltok.dll). > > I am having a problem in that the provided xmlparse.dll is > dependent on > msvcrtd.dll, the debug version of the C run-time library. > When I give my > application to someone who doesn't have MSVC installed, they of course > don't have this DLL and my app won't load because of this implicit > dependency. Shouldn't you be providing an xmlparse.dll that > is dependent > on msvcrt.dll, the release version of the run-time library? > This DLL is on > every Windows machine. I would really rather not have to distribute a > debug version of the C run-time library with my app. > > Please advise. > > Many thanks, > Joel DeYoung > joel@deyoung.net > > > > ----------------------- > Joel DeYoung > Maple Ridge, BC, Canada > joel@deyoung.net > http://joel.deyoung.net > >
Received on Friday, 14 January 2000 01:33:01 UTC