- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:07:46 +0100
- To: cowan@ccil.org, "Elizabeth J. Pyatt" <ejp10@psu.edu>
- CC: www International <www-international@w3.org>
On 26/05/2015 17:55, cowan@ccil.org wrote: > Elizabeth J. Pyatt scripsit: > >> Will this page be looking at the Irish Ogham as test cases? >> There are some archival projects on the Web where having accurate >> representation in a vertical format in Unicode could be beneficial. > > Ogham is normally transcribed (or written on a MS ab origine) like > Latin: horizontal and left-to-right. For that matter, when Latin > is inscribed on a monumental arch, it too is written bottom to top, > then horizontally, then top to bottom, with appropriate letter > rotation. yes, that was my understanding too. Not just on arches, but stone inscriptions too. The present article will focus specifically on CJKM, though i suspect that one may be able to glean information on how to address Latin and Ogham verticality quite easily while reading it. > Richard: It seems to me that the main use of sideways-left is when > you want non-vertical text to appear vertically bottom-up, as on the > spine of a German book, an arch as described above, or a caption > placed to the left of a table (often in a column that spans all the > rows). A right-side caption, per contra, needs to be written > top-down and sideways-right. yes, thanks, John. I don't really have any difficulty with the sideways-right and sideways-left values. It's just the alternative sideways value that i haven't yet fully understood the use case for. cheers, ri
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 17:07:57 UTC