- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:13:39 +0000
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
I like these suggestions. I prefer "resource" to "entity", since "entity" is overloaded in the discussion about escape sequences. I might suggest the word "prose" instead of NLC. One problem CharMod has is that the text can be quite dense and that it comes across somewhat stilted or overly formal. The word "prose" feels a bit less stiff than consistently saying "natural language content". I think the switch to 'vocabulary' is called for. Using termref is definitely a good idea. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 11:32 AM > To: www International > Subject: [charmod] key terms > > i've been trying to come up with better terms for the following, as described > at http://w3c.github.io/charmod-norm/#terminology > > Shakespeare > how about: natural language content (NLC) (see the suggestion below about > making the term into a link, which makes it clearer that this sequence is a > special term) > > > Wildebeest > this is used in the sense of 'resource', or perhaps better, since we're using > markup-related terminology, 'entity', eg. > > "It can be difficult for users to assure that a given Wildebeest or set of > Wildebeests uses a consistent textual representation because the > differences are usually not visible when viewing Wildebeest as text" > > > Namespace > should we make the switch to 'vocabulary'? > > > i suggest that all uses of these terms link back to the definitions with a > termref link. (there aren't actually all that many uses, esp. for shakespeare). > > ri
Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 19:14:05 UTC