- From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:50:17 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, www-international@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote: > > I'm becoming more convinced that Gaulish should have been registered as > a language by itself without the cel- prefix (I was talked into the > latter, by Michael Everson as I recall). Most probably. Note that ISO 639-3 will provide codes that represent Gaulish, so that might be something to consider. A registration might be premature as a result. > > FE> If for some reason a variant gaulish is registered later > > I plan to, once I can figure out how to do it. Which is not at all > clear. Can anyone point to the procedure? See RFC 4646, Section 3.5. Basically you send a registration form in that section to ietf-languages@ietf.org > > FE> How to find any cel-Grek-gaulish document is another question, not > FE> all "valid" tags make sense... :-) > > Not sure of your intent with that sentence, can you clarify? Yes, I saw the > smiley, but that didn't help me make sense of it. Consider "tlh-Cyrl-AQ": Klingon written in Cyrillic as used in Antarctica. Not a very useful tag. Addison -- Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc. Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature.
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 17:51:06 UTC