- From: Justin Wood (Callek) <116057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:33:46 -0500
- To: neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Neal Murphy wrote: >On Monday 21 February 2005 21:05, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > > >>No. Why don't you try including each document within an <object> element. >> >><object data="document.html" type="text/html" ... > >><p><a href="document.html">[Document Title]</a></p> >></object> >> >> > >In other words, include the HTML document in an enclosing container in the >page? > >For some reason, I'm not seeing the difference between displaying the nested >HTML in a frame and displaying the nested HTML in a table cell. They both >accomplish the same thing, with the latter seeming to present a cleaner >display. > >N > > > > Because anything between <html>...</html> is meant to stand alone, it is its own page... the CONTENT of that is its own, and html defines the bounds of the page, and in html docs is the :root. <object> allows placing an external object into the page...your Word document that is authored in Word is just that, and external document, this would satisfy both the semantic and logistical meanings of what you are doing imo. And would actually lessen the needs of your malformed insertion program. Where in your ideal world you could take the html word hands you and "fix it up" rather than needing to just "place" it there. ~Justin Wood (Callek on moznet IRC)
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 05:39:02 UTC