- From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:03:46 -0700
- To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>, <www-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-html-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf > Of David Perrell > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 1998 12:40 PM > To: www-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: OBJECT, inheritance, and rendering > Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > >What is a non-document? Is a PDF file not a document? It > sure isn't text... > > The most general dictionary definition of 'document' is "a > writing conveying > information", so I suppose a non-document is "a non-writing > conveying no > information". So a PDF could be considered a document, but an > image would > only be a semi-non-document unless it were inappropriate, > confusing, or > completely transparent. In light of this ambiguity (what is a document?), I think it is reasonable to infer that when section 13.5 uses the term "document," it is referring only to HTML documents. While section 13.5 does not explicitly make this distinction, I think some of the language used suggests it: "Sometimes, rather than linking to a document, an author may want to embed it directly into a primary HTML document." Also, the only example given is of an HTML document. I think the following clarifications need to be made WRT how OBJECT handles media types: First, what is a subwindow? For the purposes of this discussion, can we agree that it is a window that has the same properties as an outer window, but resides inside it and is wholly independent of the outer window (with the exception of its size, which might be dependent on the size of the outer window)? I think this definition is reasonable given the way the HTML 4 spec uses the term (which is, notably, as an *example* of what it is describing, and not a required model for implementation). If we accept that the above are accurate interpretations of the spec, then it is noteworthy that the way media types other than text/html should be included in the document is described with the same degree of specificity as is given text/html. Should these other media types reside in a "subwindow"? Or more specifically, should such an inclusion be "entirely independent of the document in which it is embedded"? I suggest that the answer is "no," for reasons regarding the treatment of transparency that I have previously described. But whether you agree with that or not, the most important thing here is that it looks like the spec doesn't say. Meaning, IMO, we really need a clarification. Braden
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 1998 16:57:33 UTC