- From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:55:20 -0700
- To: "'Chuck White'" <lillyming@earthlink.net>, <www-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-html-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf > Of Chuck White > Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 7:26 PM > To: www-html@w3.org > Subject: Fw: Style sheet and Netscape > > > > Chuck White > chuckw@javertising.com > http://www.javertising.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck White <lillyming@earthlink.net> > To: <braden@endoframe.com> > Date: Monday, August 03, 1998 7:22 PM > Subject: Re: Style sheet and Netscape > > > >First, shoot me if I'm wrong, but I don't perceive this list > as being a > help > >file for style sheet crafters. It's not. But that doesn't mean that interoperability issues aren't pertinent. > Second, aiming for > compatibility with other > >browsers (under 4.0) is fruitless. If you want to use style > sheets, write > >valid HTML that would survive a "strict" 4.0 validator, and use style > >sheets. That way, everybody can read your pages, even that > cheese salesman > >in Wisconsin looking at your site with a PDA This is, to put it mildly, naive. Implementation deficiencies (WRT the standards) ensure that not even strict HTML 4 can be guaranteed to work as expected all of the time. And the same can be said for CSS. Braden
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 1998 16:48:14 UTC