- From: Jeff de la Beaujardiere <delabeau@iniki.gsfc.nasa.gov>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 10:08:16 -0400
- To: davidp@earthlink.net
- CC: galactus@htmlhelp.com, www-html@w3.org
David Perrell writes: > Would it not be better to have an HTTP variable "HTTP_FEATURES" or > somesuch that would be a list of identifiers indicating which features > were currently active? There would be no need to make assumptions -- if > "frames" were not in the list, an intelligent server would know not to > deliver a framed set of documents. I believe that transparent content negotiation in HTTP (see http://gewis.win.tue.nl/~koen/conneg/) will provide that functionality. Clients can negotiate on the basis of media type, charset, language, and features. Feature negotiation uses "feature tags" to identify "a capability of a user agent or a preference of a user." --Jeff = J-F Pitot de La Beaujardiere = delabeau@iniki.gsfc.nasa.gov = http://globe2.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Received on Thursday, 1 May 1997 10:08:33 UTC