- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 20:39:43 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <199704302142.RAA17790@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu>, "nemo/Joel N. Weber II" <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu> wrote: > Yes, some list of features, instead of just a browser version, would have > been wiser. First you'd have to define a standardized way to indicate a feature. One approach that comes to mind is the "text/html; version=3.0" suggested MIME type for HTML 3.0. Would extending the MIME type like this be the way to go? > However, intelligently designed content wouldn't require such a feature... Depends on the application, I'd say. If you say that you can only handle Javascript, I can send an HTML document with only the Javascript, not the VBscript, JScript and what-have-youscript. -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>
Received on Thursday, 1 May 1997 14:49:12 UTC