- From: Carl Morris <msftrncs@htcnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 16:16:39 -0600
- To: "Peter Flynn" <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>, "WWW HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>
| This is because I think SGML is order dependant, but if its not, please | tell me what says it isn't... | | Alas not: the DTD says that end-tags are compulsory on I and TT, so | you can't have the </I> implying the end of TT. You _could_ design it | otherwise, I suppose... That does not allow one tag which contains others to be closed before the others have closed... that is what I thought they called an ERROR... :) I would hope that instead of guessing, logic would be applied, and the simplest way out would be taken, since the <TT> is inside the <I>, and the <I> has now been closed, logic says "there is no way to leave the <TT> open... but this would not be the first thing that followed logic...
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 1996 17:23:41 UTC