- From: Marcelo Magallon <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 10:19:50 -0600 (CST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Fri, 12 Jan 1996, Christophe JOUAN wrote: > Are they microsoftisms (just like netscape does)? yes, they are. > Are they part of suggestions that microsoft wants to propose to w3c? I don't think so... of course, I don't know what goes on inside MS or W3C, but I doubt MS wants to make ANY suggestions. They just go and implement whatever they think is "needed", just as NS did. > Or will we (poor HTML developpers) have to cope with as many HTML as > there are viewers? Poor HTML developers, they'll have to. I *think* January's issue of Netguide addresses some of this... we need some sort of standard, because I cann't tell visitors of our server, "ok, this page does fine with NS, this one with IE, this one ...". Neither can I write a page for every single browser in existance, and obviously, going for the lowest common denominator (aka, HTML 1.0, I think), is NOT a solution. Maybe big companies like Time Warner can afford doing that, but big-company-owned is not what I think of the Internet nor the WWW. Just my opinion. =Marcelo=============== mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr
Received on Saturday, 13 January 1996 11:20:05 UTC