- From: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 12:13:05 +0000 (GMT)
- To: mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr (Marcelo Magallon)
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Marcelo Magallon writes: > On Fri, 12 Jan 1996, Christophe JOUAN wrote: > > > Are they microsoftisms (just like netscape does)? > yes, they are. > > > Are they part of suggestions that microsoft wants to propose to w3c? > > I don't think so... of course, I don't know what goes on inside MS or > W3C, but I doubt MS wants to make ANY suggestions. They just go and > implement whatever they think is "needed", just as NS did. Heh. Before we all go and slit our collective wrists, however, I would refer you to a recent W3C draft Technical Report on a new HTML element which will replace app (Sun) applet (Sun) embed (Netscape) marquee (Microsoft) bgsound (Microsoft) etc etc .. And before you all go (as I did) "pah, they will never implement that" look at the authors of the spec ... and reconsider. Times they are a changin' http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-insert.html > Poor HTML developers, they'll have to. I *think* January's issue of > Netguide addresses some of this... we need some sort of standard, because > I cann't tell visitors of our server, "ok, this page does fine with NS, > this one with IE, this one ...". Right. Some sort of a standard is precisely what we need. Furthermore, one which is worked out in collaboration with the major browser vendors all sitting round a table and exploring what needs to be done. > Neither can I write a page for every > single browser in existance, True. Some folks try, but they are then tied up in tracking all the new releases on every possible platform ... > and obviously, going for the lowest common > denominator (aka, HTML 1.0, I think), is NOT a solution. The lowest common denominator is now HTML 2.0, which defines in toe-curling detail the consensus of the state of HTML in around August 94. If you want to know what is the lowest common denominator, look there. > Maybe big > companies like Time Warner can afford doing that, but big-company-owned > is not what I think of the Internet nor the WWW. Indeed. Recall the Web was originally about collaborative and ubiqitous publishing. -- Chris Lilley, Technical Author and JISC representative to W3C +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Manchester and North Training & Education Centre ( MAN T&EC ) | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Computer Graphics Unit, Email: Chris.Lilley@mcc.ac.uk | | Manchester Computing Centre, Voice: +44 161 275 6045 | | Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. Fax: +44 161 275 6040 | | M13 9PL BioMOO: ChrisL | | Timezone: UTC URI: http://info.mcc.ac.uk/CGU/staff/lilley/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Monday, 15 January 1996 07:15:04 UTC