Re: HTML 3 DTD? [was: frames ]

On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Keith M. Corbett wrote:
> Maybe this is incredibly obvious, but I would like to see W3C and the HTML
> WG continue to encourage the practice of using PUBLIC identifiers to refer
> to standardized public text.

I think this will be even more valuable if plans for network FPI 
resolution go ahead (see http://www.entmp.org/fpi-urn/). In the case of the 
expired HTML 3.0 public text, people could still refer to "-//W3C//DTD 
HTML 3.0 Draft//EN" or some such thing that the FPI resolution scheme 
could resolve to a DTD available online at W3C.

James K. Tauber <jtauber@ucs.uwa.edu.au>
Programmer and CWIS Officer
University Computing Services
University of Western Australia

Received on Monday, 1 January 1996 21:16:37 UTC