- From: Mike Batchelor <mikebat@clark.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 08:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
- Cc: www-style@www10.w3.org
Chris Tilbury once wrote... > > On 19 Jul 95 at 2:24, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > > > There are *way* too many of them! > > [snip] > > > > <Q> and <BLOCKQUOTE> are identical in meaning. They should be the > > same tag. Whether a quotation is presented embedded or blocked out > > can be specified in an attribute. > > Hmm - I don't think it can. The content model of <Q> is %text[1], > whereas the content model of <BLOCKQUOTE> is %body.content, %flow, > and %block[2]. I don't think you can alter the content model of an > element using an attribute, but I may be wrong? Well, <Q> is a text level markup, like <I> and <B>. It is suggested that text within <Q></Q> be rendered enclosed with quotation marks, or other punctuation appropriate to the language. <BQ> is used to indicate a quoted passage of text is enclosed. The two are quite different, and I think <Q> should stay in, so that on your German browser, the quotations would be rendered as the double-greater-than/double-less-than marks (what are those called) and on English browsers, as "". I agree that the other simplifications should take place. "Hey, I'm not using this <KBD> tag anywhere, let me assign some styles to it, it's shorter than typing <PERSON class=green>." -- %%%%%% mikebat@clark.net %%%%%% http://www.clark.net/pub/mikebat/ %%%%%%
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 1995 08:20:49 UTC