- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:04:47 +0100
- To: www-forms@w3.org
Hi, The form controls in XForms are only an abstract specification of what kind of interaction is desired in a certain situation. An XForms implementation is not obliged to always map a certain form control to the same GUI control. A stand-alone input control could be mapped to an edit field, while an array of input controls in a repeating structure could produce rows in a grid control. The possibilities depend on the sofistication of the XForms implementation. If you have a table-like structure in your form, you express that abstractly with a repeating structure containing the needed controls. This is what guarantees portability of forms. Regards, Werner. > Other controls ? Grid ? > > From: DESEYNE Jacques (jacques.deseyne@swift.com) > Date: Fri, Feb 01 2002 > > *Next message: Dan Dennedy: "RE: forms" > > * Next in thread: Dan Dennedy: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Dan Dennedy: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Kit Davies: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Dan Dennedy: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Kit Davies: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:45:39 +0100 > From: DESEYNE Jacques <jacques.deseyne@swift.com> > To: www-forms@w3.org > Message-id: <3C5A55B3.5F6E0964@swift.com> > Subject: Other controls ? Grid ? > > All, > > From my lecture of the current Last Call draft (I've discovered XForms only very recently), it would seem that an XForms > specification is not really intended to provide a framework for generic User Interfaces. It lacks several controls commonly found in > widely-used GUI “foundation classes”. > > Among other things, one 'control' we frequently need is a kind of grid or table, to present a set of tuples. In principle, it would > be possible to mimic a grid by repeat structures, but the appearance and behaviour will be slightly different, in the best case. Of > course, one could always envision to make her/his own non-standard extensions... > > Maybe I am missing something and I should apologise for not having read some requirements document, but what was the motivation to > limit the defined controls to more or less what is already available in HTML forms ? > > Best regards, > > -- > Jacques Deseyne > > Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (S.W.I.F.T.) > SWIFTAlliance WebStation Development Team - IT/Interfaces > http://www.swift.com > > This e-mail and any attachments thereto may contain information that is > confidential and/or proprietary and is intended for the sole use of > the recipient(s) named above. It is not intended to create or affect > any contractual arrangements between the parties. If you have received > this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender and delete it immediately. > Thank you for your cooperation. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > * Next message: Dan Dennedy: "RE: forms" > * Next in thread: Dan Dennedy: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Dan Dennedy: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Kit Davies: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Dan Dennedy: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Reply: Kit Davies: "RE: Other controls ? Grid ?" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] -- Werner Donné -- Re BVBA Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 11:05:23 UTC