- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:32:40 +0200
- To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
On Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 10:01:37 PM, Richard wrote: RI> Until I looked at the example, it was not readily apparent to me RI> how the text element fitted into the schema. I think it would be RI> helpful if you could make that clearer. In particular, I was RI> expecting to find references to it in the list of elements in the last half of section 6. Thank you for your comment, to which we sent an earlier reply indicating broad agreement and an intention to correct the spec http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0036.html Your comment is being tracked as our last call issue 15 http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/DoC/issues-lc-2010.html#issue-15 Steve Zilles made a similar comment http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/DoC/issues-lc-2010.html#issue-32 As a result, Jonathan Kew was given ACTION-92: Add expected children of all metadata elements http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/92 which is currently pending review by the WebFonts WG. You can see those edits in place here http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/spec/#Metadata (look for 'children' in the description of each element). It would assist that review if you were to indicate whether these changes satisfy your comment. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 12:32:43 UTC