W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > October to December 2010

RE: Including WOFF in ACID3

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:13:25 +0000
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E28081C29@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 11:36 AM
> To: Sylvain Galineau
> Cc: Håkon Wium Lie; John Hudson; www-font@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Including WOFF in ACID3
> 
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> > >
> > > This will cause much discussions, and much work.
> >
> > Please. You're causing the discussion by objecting on dubious grounds.
> > The change is trivial: change one single line, serve one more file. I
> > very much doubt that constitutes 'much work' for someone like Ian
> > Hickson.
> 
> For the record, howcome isn't wrong here. There's a lot of
> behind-the-scenes work with any change to the Acid tests. For example,
> each change requires an updated tarball and notification to all the
> browser vendors who use the acid tests in their automated systems.

Updating a tarball and sending emails is a lot of work ? Really ?

I trust there is more to it than that but I accept this change won't 
go through. Thanks.
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 23:14:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:35 UTC