- From: Bram Pitoyo <brampitoyo@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:46:42 -0700
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
> […] proposed revised syntax: > font-feature-settings: cpsp, pkna(0); The proposed syntax would make the CSS behavior more consistent with the existing font-variant property draft. Do you know if dash-separated "friendly name" would be allowed here? So our proposed example could be typed longhand as: font-feature-settings: capital-spacing, proportional-kana(0) Sincerely, Bram Pitoyo On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:48 PM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > I originally posted this to www-style since it's related to CSS syntax but > I thought I would repost this here to increase the feedback. > > After some discussion with others, I'm thinking about changing the > syntax of the 'font-feature-settings' property. The current CSS3 Fonts > Editor's Draft includes the ability to directly specify low-level font > features using this property. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-fonts/#font-feature-settings-prop > > The property syntax is currently defined as: > > font-feature-settings: normal | <string> > > where <string> for OpenType fonts is a comma-separated list of > <feature-name>=<number> paired values. Feature names for OpenType are > listed here: > > http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/featurelist.htm > > Other font-variant-xxx properties already provide access to many > commonly used features. This property allows access to less commonly > used features that don't fully justify a separate property. > > Defining the syntax as a string potentially allows other new font formats > to be supported in the future. But it is slightly odd to be defining it as > a string but then specifying a syntax for OpenType fonts only. > > To simplify this a bit, I'm thinking of revising this to: > > font-feature-settings: <featuretaglist> | <string> > <featuretaglist> = ident[( <integer> )]? [, ident[( <integer> )]?]* > > For OpenType fonts, <featuretaglist> must be used while for other font > formats either <featuretaglist> or <string> can be used, without no > defined format for non-OpenType fonts. The <integer> value must be 0 or > greater; if omitted the value of 1 is assumed. Feature tags that don't > exist are simply ignored. > > An example using the current syntax: > > /* Turn capital spacing on, turn proportional kana off */ > font-feature-settings: "cpsp=1, pkna=0"; > > Using the proposed revised syntax: > > font-feature-settings: cpsp, pkna(0); > > For OpenType fonts, the example below would be valid syntax but would be > effectively ignored since neither of the tags are valid OpenType feature > tags: > > font-feature-settings: this(5), that(0); > > This syntax feels more CSS-like and eliminates the use of quoted strings > for OpenType fonts. I don't know if it can completely express feature > settings for other font formats. The ability to specify a <string> > allows some room for defining a way of specifying feature settings for > future font formats. > > It would be very helpful to hear whether better support for AAT font > features should also be defined here (especially folks from Apple) or > if there are other font formats that should also be considered. > > Regards, > > John Daggett > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 13:00:57 UTC