- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Bram Pitoyo <brampitoyo@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
> > […] proposed revised syntax: > > font-feature-settings: cpsp, pkna(0); > > The proposed syntax would make the CSS behavior more consistent with > the existing font-variant property draft. Do you know if > dash-separated "friendly name" would be allowed here? > > So our proposed example could be typed longhand as: > font-feature-settings: capital-spacing, proportional-kana(0) That would be nice but there's no standard for that and nothing in the font data that contains a name like that. I think for something like this to work CSS would need to define a table of friendly names to feature tags. The advantage of allowing simple tags is that it would work for features registered after the CSS3 Fonts spec is completed. Still, it's a good idea I think. Regards, John
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 06:12:30 UTC