W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:37:06 +0100
Cc: www-font@w3.org, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3F3053F6-C2BB-4FF0-B1C2-D478C113DCA3@lorp.org>
To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Could you point to where these restrictions are listed? If you're talking about Ruby markup (or any angle-bracket markup), then I'm not sure why such markup would not be encoded with &lt; and &gt; and quotes as entities - whether <bar>text</bar> or <foo bar="text"/>

- L

On 19 Jun 2010, at 13:59, James Cloos wrote:

>>>>>> "LV" == Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com> writes:
> 
> LV> <item [lang="tag"] name="property_name1" value="property_value1"/>
> 
> Aren't tag attrib strings overly limited in what strings they can
> support?  Doesn't that make the above the wrong way to XML-ize?
> 
> Every previous discussion I've read or participated in has concluded
> that it should always be:
> 
>     <foo><bar>text</bar></foo>
> 
> and never:
> 
>    <foo bar="text"/>
> 
> Why is this discussion suddenly going in the opposite direction?
> 
> -JimC
> -- 
> James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2010 21:37:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC