W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:59:39 -0400
To: "Levantovsky\, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>, Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>, Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>, "www-font\@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m3k4pvnpnw.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
>>>>> "LV" == Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com> writes:

LV> <item [lang="tag"] name="property_name1" value="property_value1"/>

Aren't tag attrib strings overly limited in what strings they can
support?  Doesn't that make the above the wrong way to XML-ize?

Every previous discussion I've read or participated in has concluded
that it should always be:

     <foo><bar>text</bar></foo>

and never:

    <foo bar="text"/>

Why is this discussion suddenly going in the opposite direction?

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2010 13:13:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC