- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:40:41 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On 8/9/13 5:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > FWIW, just the other day I was suggesting to Dimitry that xml:base would > be useful for use with templates and shadow content. I'd be happy to > remove the markup-level feature (or maybe make it more HTML-friendly), but > per-node base URLs are something that I think we'll need more and more in > the coming years. Syndication, widgets, templating, etc, all would benefit > greatly from this kind of thing. Do these need _mutable_ per-node base urls, or per-node base urls that are created once, at node creation time, and then persist forever? I would be much happier, personally, with immutable per-node base urls. -Boris
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 21:41:12 UTC