- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 21:37:34 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > I filed a bug to remove support for xml:base given it's nowhere else: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903372 Not entirely sure > what the right solution is for baseURI though. Especially > document.baseURI is useful. FWIW, just the other day I was suggesting to Dimitry that xml:base would be useful for use with templates and shadow content. I'd be happy to remove the markup-level feature (or maybe make it more HTML-friendly), but per-node base URLs are something that I think we'll need more and more in the coming years. Syndication, widgets, templating, etc, all would benefit greatly from this kind of thing. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 21:37:56 UTC