On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 8/9/13 5:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > FWIW, just the other day I was suggesting to Dimitry that xml:base > > would be useful for use with templates and shadow content. I'd be > > happy to remove the markup-level feature (or maybe make it more > > HTML-friendly), but per-node base URLs are something that I think > > we'll need more and more in the coming years. Syndication, widgets, > > templating, etc, all would benefit greatly from this kind of thing. > > Do these need _mutable_ per-node base urls, or per-node base urls that > are created once, at node creation time, and then persist forever? > > I would be much happier, personally, with immutable per-node base urls. Immutable per-node base URLs seem like they'd be sufficient for the use cases I'm thinking of. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 21:57:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:03 UTC