Re: [Futures] Possible to multiply-resolve a resolver in weird ways

On 6/06/13 7:31 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote:
>> Without .done(), what is the recommended way of ensuring unhandled errors
>> get to window.onerror?
> The plan is for debugging tools to solve this. It seems better to have
> debugging tools solve this problem than require every developer to use
> the correct method.
>

Is there more information on this plan? That is, more than a "magic 
happens here" plan.

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 11:49:34 UTC