Re: [Futures] Possible to multiply-resolve a resolver in weird ways

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote:
> Without .done(), what is the recommended way of ensuring unhandled errors
> get to window.onerror?

The plan is for debugging tools to solve this. It seems better to have
debugging tools solve this problem than require every developer to use
the correct method.


--
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 09:31:47 UTC