- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:09:07 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: >> Since the spec hasn't been updated, is there more info on how >> `Future.accept()` will be fixed to support that code sample? > > My understanding is that the TC39-consensus is to keep the recursive > unwrapping for return values of the then() callbacks. That is not yet consensus. It was rough agreement at the meeting, but Brendan and I feel it's wrong. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 14:09:58 UTC