- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:29:38 +0100
- To: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: > Since the spec hasn't been updated, is there more info on how > `Future.accept()` will be fixed to support that code sample? My understanding is that the TC39-consensus is to keep the recursive unwrapping for return values of the then() callbacks. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 09:30:11 UTC