- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:04:21 +0200
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Jacob Rossi" <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>, "Alex Kuang" <Alex.Kuang@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:13:55 +0200, Alex Kuang <Alex.Kuang@microsoft.com> wrote: > We're OK with postponing the EventException changes to the test harness > (testharness.js) and the RfR of the 2 test cases* related to > EventException. That said, we are still requesting review (with the same > deadline, November 14) of the remaining test cases that aren't in > contention. I'll start a new RfR for the reduced set of 19 test cases if > no one makes objections by Oct 31. > > Here are the 2 EventException tests that I am going to withdraw from the > RfR: > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMEvents/tests/submissions/Microsoft/converted/dispatchEvent.DISPATCH_REQUEST_ERR.html > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMEvents/tests/submissions/Microsoft/converted/dispatchEvent.UNSPECIFIED_EVENT_TYPE_ERR.html > > * Correction to Jacob's mail: we only have 2 EventException tests, not 4 > tests; the other 2 are DOMException tests, which are not in contention. Well one of them is. As it is about redefining dispatchEvent() to throw way more exceptions than DOM Level 2 Events. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 08:05:00 UTC