- From: Alex Kuang <Alex.Kuang@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:27:33 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
So, we are going to remove this one from RfR as well: http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMEvents/tests/submissions/Microsoft/converted/dispatchEvent.NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR.html Thanks, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:04 AM To: Arthur Barstow; Jacob Rossi; Alex Kuang Cc: www-dom@w3.org; Adrian Bateman Subject: Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21 On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:13:55 +0200, Alex Kuang <Alex.Kuang@microsoft.com> wrote: > We're OK with postponing the EventException changes to the test > harness > (testharness.js) and the RfR of the 2 test cases* related to > EventException. That said, we are still requesting review (with the > same deadline, November 14) of the remaining test cases that aren't in > contention. I'll start a new RfR for the reduced set of 19 test cases > if no one makes objections by Oct 31. > > Here are the 2 EventException tests that I am going to withdraw from > the > RfR: > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMEvents/tests/submissions/Microsoft/converted/dispatchEvent.DISPATCH_REQUEST_ERR.html > > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/DOMEvents/tests/submissions/Microsoft/conv > erted/dispatchEvent.UNSPECIFIED_EVENT_TYPE_ERR.html > > * Correction to Jacob's mail: we only have 2 EventException tests, not > 4 tests; the other 2 are DOMException tests, which are not in contention. Well one of them is. As it is about redefining dispatchEvent() to throw way more exceptions than DOM Level 2 Events. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 17:28:50 UTC