- From: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:36:31 +0000
- To: "annevk@opera.com" <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Hi Anne, DOM L3 Events is not taking a normative dependency on WebIDL. However, DOM 3 Events has an informative appendix with its interfaces described in Web IDL. I just happened to use WebIDL terminology in this response to describe the issue. Sorry if this confused you. -Jacob ========================================================== From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:14:51 +0200 To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "Jacob Rossi" <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com> Message-ID: <op.vzizu1x464w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:58:11 +0200, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com> wrote: > The greatest interop is that null and empty strings be allowed. Since no > browsers truly allow event.type to be nullable, we left the type > DOMString (in which case, "null" is the correct stringification, I > believe) and not DOMString? . Does this mean DOM 3 Events is using Web IDL again? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 17:37:01 UTC