- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:14:51 +0200
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "Jacob Rossi" <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:58:11 +0200, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com> wrote: > The greatest interop is that null and empty strings be allowed. Since no > browsers truly allow event.type to be nullable, we left the type > DOMString (in which case, "null" is the correct stringification, I > believe) and not DOMString? . Does this mean DOM 3 Events is using Web IDL again? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 08:15:30 UTC