- From: Christian Parpart <cparpart@surakware.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:44:38 +0200
- To: jst@netscape.com (Johnny Stenback)
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 23 July 2003 2:07 am, Johnny Stenback wrote: > > 2. interface CustomEvent > > > > I do not believe that CustomEvent is needed since I even just implemented > > it after have the main stuff working from the events stuff. > > AFAIK CustomEvent gives just access to some members for at least the > > EventTarget's dispatching methods. While I do not know whether Java does > > support friend classes to access private members I still propose to > > remove this interface since it is very implementation specific and there > > is really no need for the application writer to have access to these > > private members of the Event interface - or give me some reasonable > > examples :o) > > One scenario where this is needed is in mixed language implementations > like Mozilla (just to name one). There script writer can create custom > events in JavaScript (or whatever supported scripting language, at least > in theory) and dispatch them, in this case the C++ implementation that > does the actual dispatch needs to be able to set the target, and so on. > In this case it gets really hard if not impossible to do this w/o a > well-defined interface on custom events that have setters for those > readonly attributes in question. Yes, of course, but EventTarget.dispatchEvent() has direct access to the Event properties (read/write) since the language C++ allows classes to be friends of other classes (EventTarget is a friend of Event, so it can even access private members). JavaScript does not need to implement the dispatchEvent algorithm so you don't need this here. Furthermore, for creating custom events you don't need the CustomEvent interface to modify the base properties of the Event object since you can initialize it via initEvent[NS] and all remaining properties are related to the EventTarget.dispatchEvent function that means, that this function will write to theses properties itself. (Or did I misunderstand something?) Greetings, Christian Parpart. - -- 00:33:27 up 70 days, 15:39, 0 users, load average: 0.06, 0.07, 0.30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/JvjWPpa2GmDVhK0RAon8AJ0etavKNwDCSYMjdKClOBXeFgXgGQCeP0sN HGSGEZT+nwa0Ac8zcALiGHk= =HTaG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 18:40:16 UTC