- From: urs muff <umuff@quark.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:54:45 -0700
- To: "'Joseph Kesselman'" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>, rayw@netscape.com
- Cc: Www-Dom <www-dom@w3.org>
This makes it easier to use an Outlook filter on it. Otherwise I have to move those messages manually, which is very annoying. Thanks a lot for your understanding. - URS C. MUFF SOFTWARE ENGINEER - R&D / XPRESS UMUFF@QUARK.COM - X6360 +1 (303) 894 3360 -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Kesselman [mailto:keshlam@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:50 AM To: rayw@netscape.com Cc: Thierry Kormann; W3c-Svg-Wg; Www-Dom; Arnaud Le Hors; Philippe Le Hégaret Subject: Re: SVG WG is asking for feedback - event propagation On Friday, 03/22/2002 at 10:13 PST, rayw@netscape.com (Ray Whitmer) wrote: > In some cases it would violate security to permit them to even be manually bridged If the DOM Event APIs are exposed, I don't see any way to prevent a relationship from being established manually -- at least not within the scope of the DOM as currently designed. This sounds like an issue for a security-aware subclass of the DOM, and I don't think that flavor is even on the Open Issues List yet. It may come closest to the read-only DOM proposal, or perhaps the transactional proposal... but I think one can make a good case for it being best left as something for higher-level code to define and deal with, since different contexts may have significantly different concerns. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 13:55:41 UTC