- From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 14:21:16 -0500
- cc: www-dom@w3.org
> L2 _is_ going to be very clear about how folk other than W3C > can define new feature identifiers to pass to Node.hasFeature() > isn't it? There's language in L2's description of hasFeature that addresses this. We might want to tweak that wording slightly. It currently says "The legal values are defined throughout this specification and listed in the Compliance section." I suspect that we meant to say "The values used by the DOM Specification". We should also probably be more explicit about the fact that names without periods (ie, without prefixes) are reserved for use by the DOM spec. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2000 14:21:40 UTC