- From: Heikki Vesalainen <hvesalai@cc.hut.fi>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 19:28:35 +0300 (EET DST)
- cc: www-dom@w3.org
Hi, I use the following notation for trees: "Father: 1. Child, 2. Child, ...". >> P: "How would", B, "be parsed?" >> B: "This" > I'm not sure I understand; is the issue that the "B" tag is "really" for > procedural markup rather than being structural? Yes... You got my point... As the element <B> of HTML has nothing to do with the structure of a document, it sounds a bit funny (to me) that it would then be represented in the way it is... I mean it's no problem - you can allways have an iterator that travels trough the tree of elements and returns allways the next string found, but e.g. in this case instead of returning the string "How would This be parsed?", it would return first "How would" then "This" and last "be parsed?" which of course has a different meaning to some utilities (users) then the first. Well... If you think I'm complitely lost, just tell me! ... Heikki Vesalainen * hvesalai@cc.hut.fi * http://www.clinet.fi/~wes It's Not Here - Wisdom is Above!
Received on Monday, 25 May 1998 12:28:40 UTC