- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:55:14 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com>
- Cc: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>, www-archive@w3.org
On 2/18/21 8:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:33 PM Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com> wrote: >> An <input> will always match :focus-visible when focused, because it takes text input. > > Sure, but there were two rules that defined different outcomes there. > I can tweak the text to make it clear that the "focus transfer" rule > is subordinate to the preceding rules. > >> It might be worth going through the WPT tests to get a feel for what behaviour is and isn't expected. > > Hm, these aren't marked as optional, which implies that the heuristics > aren't heuristic at all, and actually *are* required behavior. Is this > the case? If so, then I need to fix up the 2119 language usage; Elika > and I shifted the text today in the *opposite* direction, removing the > 2119 words and explicitly marking it as an example of possible > heuristics. They should stay optional. User interfaces should be tweakable over time in response to user research and development; unless it's required for Web compat they shouldn't be baked into a spec. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 19 February 2021 04:55:33 UTC