Dated Draft: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Rename 'proximity' and 'mandatory' From: Sebastian Zartner Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0177.html Response: Open Verified: Resolved:
Issue 2. # Summary: Add property to define poximity capture distance From: Sebastian Zartner Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0178.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0182.html Closed: Deferred Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0190.html Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 3. # Summary: Split 'scroll-snap-type' into longhands From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0328.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0108.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0101.html Response: Open Verified: Resolved:
Issue 4. # Summary: Should tracking an element snap position be required? From: Matt Rakow Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0080.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html Closed: Accepted Verified: Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
Issue 5. # Summary: Remove or maintain point-snapping From: Matt Rakow Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0177.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0102.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0103.html Open: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0105.html Note: Proposed to publish with it included, then remove in next publication, in order to archive proposal on /TR. Verified: Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0353.html
Issue 6. # Summary: Viewport terminology From: Matt Rakow Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0080.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0096.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0096.html Open: =WG= Discuss (on ML or otherwise) Verified: Resolved: Editorial
Issue 7. # Summary: Logical alignment axis mismatches physical padding From: Matt Rakow Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0090.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0133.html Closed: Rejected Verified: Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 8. # Summary: Remove or maintain 'edges' value? From: Matt Rakow Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0090.html Response: ? Closed: Deferred Verified: Resolved: Editors' discretion
Issue 9. # Summary: Rename scroll-snap-area to scroll-snap-margin From: fantasai and Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0095.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Need ability to skip content From: François Remy Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0142.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0146.html Closed: Invalid (already solved) Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0164.html
Issue 11. # Summary: Imprecise wording wrt out-of-range snap positions From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0191.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0091.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 12 Summary: Renapping requirements wording From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0109.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0111.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0091.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0145.html
Issue 13. # Summary: Clarify behavior of scroll-snap-align on scroll container From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0192.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0212.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0227.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0095.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 14. # Summary: Indirect scrolling From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0296.html #1 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0089.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0094.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 15. # Summary: Hostile mandatory snapping conflicting with target From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0296.html #2 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0089.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editors' discretion