W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

RE: [css-snappoints][css-scrollsnap] Mandatory snap-points, and voluntarily unreachable content

From: Francois Remy <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:02:37 -0800
Message-ID: <DUB408-EAS328D82C103FA592B6B26A4DA5C30@phx.gbl>
To: "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "'www-style list'" <www-style@w3.org>
> > The problem I have with both solutions and I'm not sure you addressed or
> not is that I'm afraid the spec may require browsers to allow to scroll this
> way, to make the gutter reachable (via keyboard navigation for instance):
> 
> Nope.  If you're using a background and the elements are just the blue area
> (the green being empty margin space between them), then there's no reason
> it would need to allow scrolling to the gutter.  With my suggestion of
> overlapping elements and a negative scroll-snap-margin, there's also no
> problems - the "overly large elements" stuff is based on the scroll snap area,
> which my suggestion shrinks to not include the green parts.

Thanks for the clarification Tab, I am totally relived at this point.
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:03:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:34 UTC