W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [css-snappoints] [css-scroll-snap] Summary of latest updates 1/13

From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:07:52 +1100
Cc: Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Message-Id: <B59B0E50-CFB8-4A86-99EA-A3168BED6C0C@apple.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

> On 16 Jan 2016, at 10:52 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
>> Ok.  Did you and Apple discuss any additional clarifications that
>> should be added to address their original concerns?
> 
> Not specifically, no. But we did just check in a bunch of clarifications
> in response to Sebastian Zartner's email:
>  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0099.html

We asked for 2d snap points to be deferred from this version. Is there
anyone actively arguing for it? I thought we agreed in Japan that the
use case either could be done another way or wasn't necessary (sorry,
foggy memory as usual).

Dean
Received on Saturday, 16 January 2016 00:08:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:59 UTC