W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [css-snappoints] [css-scroll-snap] Summary of latest updates 1/13

From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:07:52 +1100
Cc: Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
Message-Id: <B59B0E50-CFB8-4A86-99EA-A3168BED6C0C@apple.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

> On 16 Jan 2016, at 10:52 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> Ok.  Did you and Apple discuss any additional clarifications that
>> should be added to address their original concerns?
> Not specifically, no. But we did just check in a bunch of clarifications
> in response to Sebastian Zartner's email:
>  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0099.html

We asked for 2d snap points to be deferred from this version. Is there
anyone actively arguing for it? I thought we agreed in Japan that the
use case either could be done another way or wasn't necessary (sorry,
foggy memory as usual).

Received on Saturday, 16 January 2016 00:08:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:56 UTC