> On 16 Jan 2016, at 10:52 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> Ok. Did you and Apple discuss any additional clarifications that >> should be added to address their original concerns? > > Not specifically, no. But we did just check in a bunch of clarifications > in response to Sebastian Zartner's email: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0099.html We asked for 2d snap points to be deferred from this version. Is there anyone actively arguing for it? I thought we agreed in Japan that the use case either could be done another way or wasn't necessary (sorry, foggy memory as usual). DeanReceived on Saturday, 16 January 2016 00:08:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:56 UTC