Fwd: Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

Hi Jonas, Anne - I would appreciate it, if you would please followup on 
this thread via public-webapps. -Thanks, ArtB

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline 
September 18
Date: 	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:33:38 -0400
From: 	Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
To: 	public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking 
<sicking@mozilla.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>



During this CfC, Jonas submitted some comments to this list starting
with the following:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0531.html>

Jonas - did Mounir's responses adequately address your comments or is
there something you propose be done before LCWD is published?

There were also comments by Anne on Github (see [1]) and as I understand
it, those comments were addressed by Mounir. Anne - would you please
confirm if your comments have been adequately addressed?

-Thanks, ArtB

[1] https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/commits/gh-pages

On 9/11/14 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen
> Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the
> latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis:
>
>   <https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/>
>
> The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement and
> the Editors propose these Issues not be addressed for this first
> version of the spec:
>
>   <https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues>
>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process
> Document used by this group states the following regarding the
> significance/meaning of a LCWD:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
>
> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document)
> in the Working Draft;
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
> dependencies with other groups;
>
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement
> is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the
> technical report to later maturity levels.
> ]]
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them
> to public-webapps @ w3.org by September 18 at the latest. Positive
> response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as
> agreement with the proposal.
>
> The proposed review period is 4 weeks.
>
> Assuming this CfC passes, if there are any specific groups (e.g.
> script-coord, TAG, WAI, Privacy IG, Security IG, Mobile IG, etc.) or
> external SDOs we should explicitly ask to review the LCWD, please let
> us know.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 12:21:14 UTC