- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:56:43 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, "lehors@us.ibm.com >> Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM" <lehors@us.ibm.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > What appears indeed to be a problem is the text in section 7b of the Member > Agreement, and section 2.2 of the Invited Expert and Collaborator Agreement. > I've asked about this on the public-w3process list: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0156.html The reply from Michael there does not inspire confidence. The Dual License is not GPL-compatible and is a far cry from CC0. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 09:57:10 UTC