W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2013

Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:27:33 +0900
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org)" <robin@w3.org>, "Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com)" <acolwell@google.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130820012732.GD68472@sideshowbarker>
Hi Paul,

OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17.

  --Mike

Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-20 01:23 +0000:

> There appears to have been some confusion here.  The WG Decision clearly stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the publication date.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Michael[tm] Smith
> Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM
> To: Paul Cotton
> Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org
> Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000:
> 
> > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with Robin and/or Mike
> >
> > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published?  Is it going to be
> > published before next week’s publishing moratorium?
> 
> No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that before we
> can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set an end date/deadline
> for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now before September 5, and the
> LC-comments end date needs to be at least 3 weeks after that, so that means
> an end date of September 26th at the earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd
> probably be prudent to have an LC comments period longer than 3 weeks.
> 
>   --Mike
> 

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 01:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:34:47 UTC