- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- cc: www-archive@w3.org
Ping? On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > > > > Only Chrome, AFAIK. FF, Safari both ask for a password. > > Firefox doesn't ask for a password for >90% of users. > Chrome, IE, and Safari all use the OS system password service. > > I don't understand what you think is the difference between the browsers > here. > > > > The attack is by colleauges, members of family, etc, not by hardened black hats. > > In all cases, if you have access to the machine, all it takes is trivial > software that's widely available to snoop on anyone else using the > machine. Or, even without such software, you can just go to the relevant > site, have the browser automatically log you in, and you don't even need > the password (and you can grab the password using a trivial bookmarklet or > using the browser's built-in tools). > > Fundamentally, if you have physical access to the machine, asking for an > additional password doesn't do anything to stop you. In all cases, the > passwords are available unprotected if you are logged in. (Indeed, with > Firefox, which doesn't use the system password service as I understand it, > the passwords aren't even encrypted.) If you don't trust your colleagues > or family members to not snoop on you, you _really_ shouldn't be giving > them access to your computer. > > It doesn't take a "hardened black hat". The software you need to do this > kind of thing is widely available online, and one's sister would have no > trouble finding it. > > Pretending that you have protected the system by asking for an unnecessary > password doesn't improve security, it's just security theatre. Indeed, it > is probably counter-productive: it makes the user think it's safer to hand > the machine to someone else than it actually is. > > -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 20:03:01 UTC